Post Your Questions for Acquisitions and Cataloging on this blog.
The staff in AMS (Acquisitions & Metadata Services) are here to answer your questions and make appropriate changes to our processes and procedures based on trends we identify by tracking and analyzing requests coming to us from you, our customers.
Post your questions for Acquisitions and Cataloging here. We will use comments on your post to follow up with our responses and to continue communication on your original post.
This works like a listserv in terms of keeping all discussion on one topic together but we have much more visibility and flexibility and access to customer data by using this blog format instead of a listserv.
Click on How-to Information under Labels in the bottom-right sidebar to learn how to add a label to your post. It's easy and will make sure your post is categorized for tracking. This helps us assess our service and identify areas to improve.
Thank you for being a great customer.
Showing posts with label LTI Authority Control. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LTI Authority Control. Show all posts
Tuesday, January 31, 2012
LTI followup to subject string validation question and unlinked headings report
The "unlinked headings" report lists headings which were not linked (at $a level) to an LC or an LTI authority record.
Should you be interested, an optional report of "partially validated headings" is available on request. This report lists headings that were linked at $a, but there were subsequent subfields in the heading of which one or more could not be validated by an authority record, or from one of out tables (floats, geographic, language, etc.) In the "names" file, the bulk of these are name/title headings where the name links; in the subjects, our tables allow us to validate many of the "main + subdivision" strings, so there are fewer reported.
Should you be interested, an optional report of "partially validated headings" is available on request. This report lists headings that were linked at $a, but there were subsequent subfields in the heading of which one or more could not be validated by an authority record, or from one of out tables (floats, geographic, language, etc.) In the "names" file, the bulk of these are name/title headings where the name links; in the subjects, our tables allow us to validate many of the "main + subdivision" strings, so there are fewer reported.
LTI Summary of Base Bib File Refresh
Monday, Jan. 9 2012.
1,206,609 changed records in: EMORY-AUP114.CHG. This is the number of corrected bibs (new authorized headings) from LTI process.
The output files and reports from the 4th Quarter 2011
>are on the LTI FTP server for you to retrieve
>using your AEX/AUP user name and password:
>
>EMORY-AUP114.LSB -- 85,252,816 bytes -- text listing of bib heading
>changes
>EMORY-AUP114.LSA -- 11,139,799 bytes -- text listing of auth rec changes
>EMORY-AUP114.ULH -- 12,845,350 bytes -- text listing of unlinked headings
>EMORY-AUP114.CHG -- 1,528,203,240 bytes -- changed bib records
>EMORY-AUP114.LCN -- 859,023,778 bytes -- new/revised LC name auth recs
>EMORY-AUP114.LCS -- 84,582,331 bytes -- new/revised LC subj auth recs
>EMORY-AUP114.LCG -- 382,607 bytes -- new/revised LC Genre/Form auth recs
>EMORY-AUP114.LCM -- 12,823,225 bytes -- new/revised NLM MeSH auth recs
>EMORY-AUP114.LCDEL -- 0 bytes -- delete authority records
>EMORY-AUP114-nfichg.ACR -- 463,314 bytes -- list of non-filing ind.
>changes
Friday, June 10, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
