Post Your Questions for Acquisitions and Cataloging on this blog.

The staff in AMS (Acquisitions & Metadata Services) are here to answer your questions and make appropriate changes to our processes and procedures based on trends we identify by tracking and analyzing requests coming to us from you, our customers.

Post your questions for Acquisitions and Cataloging here. We will use comments on your post to follow up with our responses and to continue communication on your original post.

This works like a listserv in terms of keeping all discussion on one topic together but we have much more visibility and flexibility and access to customer data by using this blog format instead of a listserv.

Click on How-to Information under Labels in the bottom-right sidebar to learn how to add a label to your post. It's easy and will make sure your post is categorized for tracking. This helps us assess our service and identify areas to improve.
Thank you for being a great customer.

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Update on Extraction from Sirsi of Emory Local Notes in Authority Records

Thursday Jan. 5, 2012
This extrcact serves for backup to search for missing 690 information.
Marian was thinking of a full extract of authority files containing 690s for use in a potential project to merge 690 notes only into matching 001/010 after we do the full restore of corrected bibs, new authorities, and re-index. 

On 1/5/12 12:37 PM, "Kelley, Marian" <libmhk@emory.edu> wrote:

>The authority record 690 note file was output in a pipe-delimited file
>that has three columns:
>001 | 010 | 690 |
> 
>There was no output of complete records.
> 
>Marian Kelley

No comments: